Australian Government AI Resources (Federal, State & Territory)¶
Purpose: Directory of official federal, state and territory AI policies, strategies and assurance frameworks Audience: Public sector organisations, cross-jurisdictional projects and government vendors | Time: 30-45 minutes
This page curates official Australian government resources on AI for public sector use, covering federal agencies and all states and territories. It focuses on whole-of-government strategies and policies, AI assurance frameworks, information/privacy guidance from statutory bodies (e.g., information commissioners, ombudsmen) and records management directives. Where education-specific positions exist, they're included because they are often the most mature sector guidance.
Last verified: February 2026. Links point only to official government or statutory sources.
General Guidance
Federal, state and territory resources are designed to work within each jurisdiction's legislative and policy settings. If you operate across multiple jurisdictions—or consume services from another state—start with the local requirements and then map to national artefacts (see Alignment below). Treat AI projects as socio-technical: combine policy, risk, privacy, security, procurement, records management and assurance practices from the outset.
Note: Policies and guidance change rapidly (especially around generative AI). Always check for the latest version and any departmental circulars or implementation notes before relying on a specific document.
How to Use This Page
- Identify your jurisdiction and applicable agency cluster (e.g., central DPC/DTF/Finance, Education, Records Authority, or Information Commissioner).
- For each item:
- Confirm status/version and whether it is mandatory (policy/standard) or advisory (guidance/toolkit).
- Perform or update risk and privacy impact assessments (PIA/DPIA) and recordkeeping actions.
- Where AI supports decisions that affect rights or benefits, apply administrative law duties and human-in-the-loop controls.
- If your work spans states, use the Alignment guidance to harmonise.
Federal (Australian Government)¶
- National AI Centre (NAIC) — within the Department of Industry, Science and Resources; drives AI adoption and coordinates the Responsible AI Network. See also our guide to the Guidance for AI Adoption (AI6).
- Guidance for AI Adoption — six essential practices (NAIC) — updated guidance replacing the Voluntary AI Safety Standard; sets out six essential practices for responsible AI governance.
- National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government — endorsed by Data & Digital Ministers (June 2024); the national baseline that most state/territory frameworks align to.
- Digital Transformation Agency — AI guidance — whole-of-government architecture and guidance for AI in Australian Government agencies.
- OAIC — Artificial Intelligence and Privacy — guidance from the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner on privacy obligations when developing or using AI.
- OAIC — Privacy Impact Assessment guide — how to conduct PIAs, applicable to AI systems handling personal information.
For a detailed overview of Australian AI legislation, see our AI & Australian Legislation page.
New South Wales (NSW)¶
Australia-first AI workplace legislation: passed 12 February 2026; primary duties not yet commenced
The Work Health and Safety Amendment (Digital Work Systems) Act 2026 (assent received 18 February 2026) makes NSW the first Australian jurisdiction to impose express WHS duties on employers using AI, algorithms, automation and digital work platforms. As of June 2026, the primary duties have not yet commenced. Commencement requires SafeWork NSW to complete public consultation on guidelines for WHS entry permit holders, publish the guidelines, and observe a statutory waiting period of at least one month. Those guidelines are still under development. Monitor SafeWork NSW and legislation.nsw.gov.au for proclamation announcements. Two primary duties are established:
1. Primary Duty (s 19(3)(c1)): A person conducting a business or undertaking (PCBU) must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the health and safety of workers is not put at risk from the use of digital work systems by the business.
2. Work Allocation Duty (s 21A): PCBUs using digital work systems to allocate work must ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the allocation does not put workers' health and safety at risk. PCBUs must specifically consider whether digital work systems result in:
- Excessive or unreasonable workloads
- Use of excessive or unreasonable metrics to assess and track worker performance
- Excessive or unreasonable monitoring or surveillance of workers
- Unlawful discriminatory practices or decision-making
Union inspection rights: WHS entry permit holders can require reasonable assistance to access and inspect digital work systems where a safety breach is suspected (48 hours' notice required).
"Digital work system" is broadly defined as an algorithm, AI, automation or online platform used to allocate work. Applies to all NSW employers using AI scheduling, algorithmic management, digital performance monitoring or automated work allocation.
Employers should map their AI-driven work allocation systems now in preparation for commencement. (Sources: Norton Rose Fulbright, Hamilton Locke, NSW Parliament)
- NSW Office for Artificial Intelligence (Digital NSW) — dedicated AI office (est. Sept 2025) driving safe, strategic AI adoption across NSW Government.
- NSW AI Strategy (Digital NSW) — whole-of-government direction for safe, outcomes-focused AI.
- AI Ethics Policy — mandatory principles (trust, transparency, customer benefit, fairness, privacy, accountability).
- NSW AI Assessment/Assurance Framework (AIAF) — structured, risk-based assessment; updated to address generative AI.
- Digital Assurance Framework — mandatory assurance for eligible ICT/AI projects (see also NSW Gateway).
- Generative AI — Basic Guidance — practical workforce guidance for responsible GenAI use.
- AI in NSW Government — Case studies — examples of applied AI across agencies.
- NSW Ombudsman — Automated decision-making (ADM) systems — administrative law duties and implementation steps.
- Information & Privacy Commission (IPC) NSW
- ADM, digital government & preserving information access rights (factsheet) — obligations for ADM while protecting information access rights.
- Guide to undertaking Privacy Impact Assessments on AI systems & projects — PIA guidance tailored to AI (PDF available on page).
- Scan of the AI regulatory landscape — privacy & information access lens on AI regulation.
Victoria (VIC)¶
- Administrative Guideline — Safe & Responsible Use of GenAI in VPS — mandatory minimum standards endorsed by Victoria's Secretaries Board (Sept 2024); covers accountability, risk management and data safeguards for all public service bodies.
- Guidance — Safe & Responsible Use of GenAI in VPS — practical companion to the administrative guideline; covers dos and don'ts, privacy obligations, scenario examples and alignment with Australia's AI Ethics Principles.
- OVIC — Use of personal information with publicly available GenAI tools (VPS) — privacy expectations when staff use public GenAI tools.
- OVIC — Use of enterprise GenAI tools (VPS minimum expectations) — baseline controls for enterprise GenAI deployments.
- Public Record Office Victoria — AI Technologies & Recordkeeping Policy — mandatory recordkeeping directives for AI.
- Victorian Public Sector Data Sharing Framework — principles and practice for data sharing that supports safe AI use.
- Policies & standards for government IT (consolidated library) — whole-of-VPS ICT policy library relevant to AI governance.
Victoria — $3.5M AI and Deeptech Pre-Accelerator Initiative (announced 17 June 2026)
The Victorian Government announced $3.5 million for nine pre-accelerator program operators supporting AI and deeptech startups at the Victorian Startup Gala on 17 June 2026. The announced funding is for operators rather than direct startup grants, with each provider eligible for up to $400,000. The operators are Boab AI, Boson Ventures, Cicada Innovations, CoLabs Australia, HEX, Illume Ventures, Jumpstart Studio, MedTech Actuator and RMIT DiscoveryHUB.
A featured program is VICTOR:AI — an eight-week cohort for AI-native startups offering access to AI tools, co-working space and milestone-based grants. This initiative is consistent with Victoria's AI Mission Statement (announced 30 January 2026), positioning Victoria as a national AI leader.
Provider intake arrangements and timing vary. The announcement did not specify which programs were accepting applications or confirm that funding had been disbursed. See djsir.vic.gov.au for the provider list and announced program details (accessed 21 June 2026).
Victoria — workplace surveillance and AI proposal (announced 20 July 2026; pre-legislative)
The Victorian Government announced that Labor would introduce workplace surveillance protections covering AI-enabled monitoring and automated work decisions. This is an announcement of proposed laws, not a bill. A search of the Victorian legislation register's bills list for 2026 on 8 September 2026 returned no workplace surveillance bill, so nothing in this entry creates a current obligation.
The announcement describes proposed protections including:
- A worker's right to be told when they are being monitored, and employer consultation before surveillance is introduced or changed
- Surveillance at work only for a legitimate purpose, with covert surveillance confined to suspected unlawful activity and strictly controlled
- Biometric data collected only where no less intrusive option exists, and not used to read emotions unless there is a legitimate reason such as fatigue monitoring for truck drivers
- No use of AI to track matters such as bathroom breaks, a limp or pregnancy without a specific, legitimate purpose
- Stronger protection against workplace surveillance and AI being used to discriminate by race, gender, sexuality, religion or other personal characteristics
- Human review of any significant automated decision made using surveillance data that affects a worker's rights, and worker access to their own surveillance data
Organisations using AI scheduling, biometric monitoring or algorithmic management in Victoria should watch for a bill and its final scope. See the official Victorian announcement (accessed 8 September 2026) and the Victorian Government workplace surveillance page.
Victoria — online platform accountability proposal (announced 19 July 2026; pre-legislative)
The Victorian Government announced two proposed reforms directed at social media and AI platforms. A search of the Victorian legislation register's bills list for 2026 on 8 September 2026 returned no bill for either reform, so neither is current law.
- VCAT "demasking" orders: the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal would be given power to make orders requiring social media companies to reveal the identity of anonymous users accused of online vilification.
- Lower threshold for claims by minors: the current requirement to prove permanent impairment of 10 per cent or more would be removed for negligence claims brought on behalf of minors against social media and AI providers. Whether the change extends beyond children to adults is stated as a matter to be considered as the law is drafted.
The announcement says both reforms will be developed following targeted consultation with VCAT, the courts and other stakeholders. See the official Victorian announcement (accessed 8 September 2026).
Victoria — premier change (28 July 2026): open question for pending AI-adjacent bills
Ben Carroll was sworn in as Victoria's Premier on 28 July 2026, replacing Jacinta Allan, with Gabrielle Williams as Deputy Premier. As at 8 October 2026, no statement has been found on whether the Carroll Government will keep the two AI-adjacent proposals above (workplace surveillance and AI-in-hiring limits; online safety for minors). Both remain pre-legislative ahead of the November 2026 state election. Do not assume either will go ahead or be dropped until a bill is introduced or the Government states a position.
Queensland (QLD)¶
- Queensland AI Hub — government-funded hub connecting Queensland businesses, industry and universities to local AI talent and technologies; programs include Launch AI Pre-Accelerator and regional chapters.
- QGEA — Use of Generative AI — policy intent, roles, procurement/technical considerations, risk management.
- QGEA — Artificial intelligence (category landing) — entry point to governance policy and guidance.
- QGEA — Foundation principles — cross-cutting architecture principles relevant to AI solution design and governance.
- Office of the Information Commissioner (OIC) Queensland
- Government use of AI in Queensland — commissioner perspective and key privacy considerations.
- Microsoft Copilot & privacy risks of using GenAI — practical checklist applicable to any GenAI rollout.
Queensland — Manufacturing AI Uplift Trial ($750,000, announced 30 September 2026)
The Queensland Government is investing \(750,000 in a Manufacturing AI Uplift Trial Program, delivered by the ARM Hub, to help Queensland manufacturers implement practical AI solutions. Expressions of interest close 30 October 2026. This is **separate from** the still-unnamed ~\)10 million small and family business AI adoption program announced in June 2026, which remains announced but not yet open for applications. See AI Grants & Funding for detail.
South Australia (SA)¶
- Office for AI (ai.sa.gov.au) — Australia's first dedicated state-level Office for AI; coordinates AI strategy, pilot projects and policy across SA Government.
- AI Knowledge Centre — curated resources and guidance from the Office for AI.
- Guideline 13.1 — Use of Generative AI & Large Language Models (DPC) — whole-of-government guidance aligned to the national AI assurance approach.
- DTF ICT/Digital/Cyber — AI landing — central pointer to SA Government AI policy artefacts (incl. G13.1).
- State Records SA — Artificial Intelligence & Information Management — recordkeeping obligations when developing/using AI.
- Department for Education — EdChat (GenAI chatbot) overview — agency adoption example and usage guidance in schools.
- State Budget — Digital Investment Fund: AI program — funding context to grow AI use in services.
South Australia — Data Centre and AI Infrastructure Act proposed (June 2026)
The South Australian Government's June 2026 Data Centre Strategy commits to consulting on a proposed Act covering development approvals, energy, water, security and local benefits. The Act remains proposed; existing planning mechanisms and the proposed future legislation have different legal status.
See AI Data Centres and Compute Governance in Australia for a detailed, source-led summary and the official South Australian strategy.
South Australia — Royal Commission into Artificial Intelligence commenced (1 October 2026)
The South Australian Government's Royal Commission into Artificial Intelligence — reported as the first of its kind in Australia — commenced on schedule on 1 October 2026, with a final report due no later than 1 July 2027. Three commissioners have been named: Dr Iain Ross (chair; chair of the federal Net Zero Economy Authority, former president of the Fair Work Commission, and former Federal Court and Victorian Supreme Court judge), Kate Pounder (former Tech Council of Australia CEO), and Professor Christopher Manning (co-founder of Stanford's Human-Centered AI institute). The announcement said the Commission would focus on policy and regulatory settings at state and national level, education including schools and higher education, public services provided by the state including health, skills and workforce, and AI-related infrastructure including energy transformation and water usage.
A royal commission is an inquiry. It does not itself create obligations for organisations using AI.
See the official Department of the Premier and Cabinet announcement (dated 11 August 2026) and reporting on the commissioner appointments: ABC News, Capital Brief and InDaily (all accessed 4 October 2026, via search).
Western Australia (WA)¶
- WA Government Artificial Intelligence Policy & Assurance Framework (landing) — principles-based policy for WA public sector, including GenAI.
- AI Assurance Framework — overview/download — risk assessment and assurance templates and guidance.
- WA Health AI Policy: the WA Department of Health updated its AI policy on 12 February 2026. Monitor the WA Health website for the latest version and sector-specific guidance.
- Western Australian Artificial Intelligence Advisory Board — oversight/advice structure for agency implementations.
- Artificial Intelligence & Record Keeping — clarifies record status of AI outputs and related obligations.
- Digital Strategy Roadmap 2025 — broader digital program context for AI initiatives.
Tasmania (TAS)¶
- Guidance for the use of AI in Tasmanian Government (v1.4, Sept 2024) — seven recommendations (risk-based approach, procurement, capability, transparency); aligned with the national AI assurance framework.
- DPAC Digital Strategy & Services — Policies — links to AI guidance one-pager plus related cloud/cyber/privacy policies.
Australian Capital Territory (ACT)¶
- ACTPS Acceptable Use of ICT Resources Policy — includes specific conditions for generative AI (appropriateness, confidentiality, security).
- Education Directorate — Position on use of AI in ACT public schools — classroom and teacher guidance for safe use.
- ACT Government Technology Directions — strategic context for digital/AI capability across ACT Government (PDF available on page).
- ACT Government Data Centre Framework (announced 26 August 2026) — restricts future data centre development to land already zoned for commercial, industrial, transport/services or certain non-urban use. The ACT Government has confirmed it does not support an ACT Greens motion for a moratorium on new data-centre development. See AI Data Centres and Compute Governance for full detail.
Northern Territory (NT)¶
- NT AI Assurance Framework (Digital Territory) — ethics principles, self-assurance assessment, and AI Advisory Board; generative AI explicitly in scope.
Alignment Across Jurisdictions
Many jurisdictions explicitly reference or align to the National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (endorsed by Data & Digital Ministers on 21 June 2024). When planning cross-jurisdictional work:
- ✅ Use the local state/territory policy and assurance artefacts to determine mandatory steps.
- ✅ Map to the national framework to ensure consistent governance, documentation and transparency across borders.
- ✅ Reconcile differences in privacy law, administrative law practice, procurement rules and records obligations by documenting equivalences and any additional local controls.
- ✅ For agencies consuming services or models hosted in another jurisdiction, require suppliers to provide evidence of AI assurance against both the provider's and customer's frameworks, plus PIA/DPIA, security risk assessment and records/disposal mapping and a clear ADM accountability model (human oversight, contestability, redress).
Maintenance & Contributions
- Keep this page updated with the latest versions and add sector-specific positions (health, justice, education) when central agencies or statutory bodies publish them.
- Prefer official sources (government and statutory bodies). Include the document title, issuing body, version/date and whether it is mandatory or guidance.
Disclaimer & Licence
Disclaimer: This directory provides links to official Australian federal, state and territory government AI resources. SafeAI-Aus has exercised care in curation but does not guarantee accuracy, currency, or completeness of external government resources. Policies change frequently. Always verify the latest version and applicability with the relevant government agency before relying on specific documents.
Licence: Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). You are free to copy, adapt and redistribute with attribution: "Source: SafeAI-Aus (safeaiaus.org)"